Sustainable Waste Management in Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects: A Case Study from Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Large-scale infrastructure development is central to Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030, but construction activity also generates significant waste. This article presents the waste management approach at DG-II, Infra Package-1, where approximately 130 tonnes of waste are generated monthly, equivalent to about 1,560 tonnes annually if the rate remains constant. The system covers general and construction waste generated across work fronts, offices and site facilities. Waste is segregated and temporarily stored, then collected and transported by Delta Solution, the designated waste management service provider, with final disposal at AKAM. The case study highlights how structured waste control, traceability, source segregation and resource recovery can strengthen environmental performance and support the Kingdom’s transition toward a circular economy.

Introduction

Saudi Arabia is undergoing major infrastructure and urban development under Vision 2030. While these projects provide substantial economic and social benefits, they also create construction, demolition and general waste. Uncontrolled waste accumulation can affect housekeeping, dust control, soil and environmental quality, site safety and the efficient use of disposal capacity.

Effective project-level waste management is therefore an important part of environmental compliance and sustainability performance. The objective is not only to remove waste from site, but to prevent unnecessary generation, segregate recoverable materials, maintain traceability and minimize the quantity requiring final disposal.

waste management at DG-II, Infra Package-1 Saudi Arabia

Waste Generation at DG-II, Infra Package-1

DG-II, Infra Package-1 generates approximately 130 tonnes of waste per month, representing an estimated 1,560 tonnes per year. Waste is generated from construction work fronts, infrastructure activities, offices, site facilities, material-handling areas and other supporting operations.

The principal streams addressed by the project include general waste and construction waste, together with potentially recoverable materials such as plastics, timber, metals, packaging and other construction materials where applicable. Accurate identification at the point of generation is essential because mixing recoverable materials with disposal waste reduces recycling and recovery potential.

Waste Management System

The project follows a controlled management chain:

Waste Generation → Segregation at Source → Temporary Storage → Collection & Transportation by Delta Solution → Recycling/Recovery Where Applicable → Final Disposal at AKAM → Records and Traceability

Source-segregation is a critical control. Appropriate, clearly identified collection points help prevent mixing and improve housekeeping. Temporary storage areas should remain orderly, adequately sized, accessible to collection vehicles, protected from uncontrolled dispersal and monitored to prevent overflow.

Delta Solution manages collection and transportation of project-generated waste. A defined service provider arrangement establishes responsibility for collection, loading, transportation and transfer to the appropriate destination. Waste quantities, dates, categories, collection records and disposal documentation should be maintained to demonstrate traceability.

Final Disposal and the Waste Hierarchy

Waste requiring disposal is transferred through the established management chain to AKAM for final disposal. From a sustainability perspective, however, disposal should remain the final option rather than the first response. The preferred waste hierarchy is:

Prevention → Reduction → Reuse → Recycling → Recovery → Treatment → Disposal

The long-term objective is therefore to reduce the proportion of the 130 tonnes/month that ultimately requires disposal. Increasing recovery of suitable construction materials can reduce demand for virgin resources and improve overall project environmental performance.

Environmental and ESG Benefits

A structured waste management system provides practical environmental, social and governance benefits. Environmentally, it reduces uncontrolled dumping, littering, accumulation and unnecessary disposal while creating opportunities for recycling and recovery. Socially, good housekeeping contributes to cleaner and safer working areas and supports workforce awareness. From a governance perspective, defined responsibilities, contractor management, inspection, records and traceability provide evidence of controlled waste handling.

Waste management should therefore be considered an ESG performance area rather than only a housekeeping activity.

Key Performance Indicators

KPI Recommended Measurement
Total waste generated 130 tonnes/month (current reported rate)
Estimated annual generation 1,560 tonnes/year
General waste tonnes/month
Construction waste tonnes/month
Recycled/recovered waste tonnes/month
Waste sent for final disposal tonnes/month
Recycling / diversion rate %
Waste-management observations number/month
Waste-related incidents number/month
Disposal documentation % complete

Waste Diversion Rate (%) = [(Total Waste Generated − Waste Sent for Final Disposal) / Total Waste Generated] × 100.

Opportunities for Improvement

  • Strengthen source segregation with dedicated containers for major recyclable and non-recyclable streams.
  • Increase recovery of suitable concrete, metals, asphalt, timber, packaging and plastics.
  • Conduct periodic waste audits to identify major waste-generating activities, mixed streams and reduction opportunities.
  • Use digital tracking to connect waste generator, waste type, quantity, collection date, transporter, destination and disposal/recovery evidence.
  • Address waste at the procurement stage by reducing excess materials, unnecessary packaging, damage, overstocking and construction losses.
  • Promote circular procurement and beneficial reuse where technically, legally and environmentally appropriate.

Alignment with Vision 2030 and Circular Economy

Saudi Arabia’s sustainability direction increasingly emphasizes resource efficiency, recycling and waste diversion. Infrastructure projects can translate these national objectives into practical site-level action by moving from a linear model—Take → Make → Use → Dispose—toward a circular model based on Reduce → Reuse → Recover → Recycle → Reintroduce into the Economy.

For DG-II, the existing controlled collection and disposal system provides a foundation for this transition. The next step is to increase material recovery, improve waste data and progressively reduce dependence on final disposal.

Conclusion

DG-II, Infra Package-1 demonstrates the importance of a defined waste management chain for large-scale infrastructure development. With approximately 130 tonnes of waste generated monthly, systematic segregation, temporary storage, collection and transportation by Delta Solution, and final disposal at AKAM provide a controlled pathway from generation to destination.

The strongest sustainability opportunity is to move beyond disposal-oriented management. Prevention, source segregation, reuse, recycling, recovery and digital traceability can convert waste management into a measurable environmental and ESG opportunity. For major infrastructure projects in Saudi Arabia, the goal should be simple: generate less waste, recover more value and dispose only what cannot reasonably be recovered.

Author’s Perspective

As infrastructure development accelerates across Saudi Arabia, environmental professionals can help transform waste management from a compliance requirement into a strategic sustainability function. Integrating NCEC requirements, Vision 2030 objectives, ESG principles, circular economy thinking and reliable waste data can improve project performance while supporting the Kingdom’s broader environmental ambitions.

Note for Publication

The 130 tonnes/month figure is the project-level quantity provided for this case study. A final publication should add the available monthly waste manifests or contractor records to substantiate the quantity and, where available, provide a breakdown by waste stream and recycling/final disposal destination.

References

  1. Saudi Vision 2030. Vision 2030 Annual Report 2025 – A Sustainable Vision / Circular Economy.
  2. Blaisi, N. I. (2019). Construction and demolition waste management in Saudi Arabia: Current practice and roadmap for sustainable management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 221, 167–175.
  3. Life Cycle Assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), 7382.
  4. Enhancing the circular economy in Saudi Arabia’s construction sector: a source segregation perspective through thematic analysis. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 2026.
  5. Saudi Arabia National Center for Waste Management (MWAN). Technical Guidelines – Construction and Demolition Waste Management.
  6. Saudi Arabia National Center for Waste Management. Waste Management Law and Implementing Regulations.
  7. Saudi Investment Recycling Company (SIRC). Sustainability Report 2024.

Top Firms for Renewable Energy Technology Consulting

A wind farm doesn’t care about your forecast. It produces what the weather gives it, and someone still has to make that unpredictable output fit into a grid built for steady coal and gas plants. That’s the gap most renewable energy consultants get hired to close.

Below are 15 firms doing that work right now, from household names in energy engineering to small teams most people outside the industry have never heard of.

clean energy consultants discussing a wind energy project

So What Are Companies Actually Paying For?

Talk to anyone running grid operations and DER integration comes up fast. Rooftop solar, home batteries, EV chargers on every other driveway — none of that hardware was designed with the grid in mind. Somebody has to get it all working together, and internal IT teams rarely have the bandwidth.

A few things keep showing up on consultants’ project lists:

  • Forecasting models that don’t fall apart the moment weather gets weird
  • DERMS platforms built to handle thousands of tiny, scattered assets at once
  • Regulatory reporting rules that shift faster than compliance teams can keep up
  • Digital twins for turbines, substations, storage sites — basically anything expensive enough to justify one

Companies Worth Knowing in 2026

DXC Technology

DXC works with over 185 energy clients — Bayernwerk and Endeavour Energy among them — building AI forecasting tools, DERMS integrations and emissions-reporting dashboards. Its energy practice also partners with Dell and Microsoft on smart grid projects.

DNV

Started as a Norwegian ship classification society, of all things, and somehow ended up certifying wind turbines and writing the bankability reports offshore wind lenders won’t proceed without. Its annual Energy Transition Outlook gets cited constantly. Probably the biggest name on this list, and it shows.

Wood Mackenzie

Based in Edinburgh, now owned by Veritas Capital. Less about advice, more about numbers — the kind of solar and battery pricing data investors feed straight into their IRR spreadsheets.

ICF International

A Virginia firm that lives inside US utility and Department of Energy circles, mostly on demand-response design and electrification planning. Not glamorous work. Somebody has to do it, though, and ICF has been doing it for years.

Ramboll

Danish engineers who worked on the foundations for Hornsea, one of the world’s larger offshore wind projects. They also run environmental impact studies across Europe and, increasingly, Asia.

AFRY

Swedish, formerly known as Pöyry, with roots going back to hydro and bioenergy projects decades ago. Lately the phone rings more often about green hydrogen electrolyzer siting across the Nordics.

Fichtner

A family-run engineering firm out of Stuttgart. No flashy branding, no big marketing push — just three decades of solar plant design work across the Middle East and Southeast Asia, quietly.

Black & Veatch

Kansas-based, with roots in engineering-procurement-construction. US utilities call them when they need battery storage interconnection studies done before flipping any switches.

Natural Power

A small Scottish outfit, independent since 1991, that punches well above its size. Wind resource assessment, community wind farm permitting — the unsexy groundwork that decides whether a project ever gets built.

K2 Management

Danish owner’s-engineer specialists who cut their teeth on Taiwan’s early offshore wind buildout. Now moving into floating wind feasibility work, which is where a lot of the industry’s attention is heading.

Green Giraffe

Not a technology shop at all, really — a Dutch financial advisory boutique. But the project finance structures they build for offshore wind and green hydrogen deals often decide whether anything gets constructed in the first place.

green hydrogen production plant

Xodus Group

Started in oil and gas out of Aberdeen, then pivoted hard into offshore wind cable routing and environmental consenting. Old industry, new direction.

Clean Energy Associates (CEA)

American firm with staff scattered across China and Southeast Asia. Their job is auditing solar module factories and battery supply chains — quality control, forced-labor compliance checks. Unglamorous. Also essential, and increasingly non-negotiable for buyers.

Mercom Capital Group

Operating out of India and the US, Mercom publishes the funding and M&A data everyone in solar and storage watches closely, and advises investors trying to make sense of India’s fast-moving renewables market.

TÜV Rheinland

A German testing and certification giant. Inspects solar installations, writes the technical due diligence reports lenders won’t skip before closing financing on a project.

Bottom Line

None of these 15 firms covers forecasting, financing, certification and construction equally well — and that’s sort of the point. The sector rewards specialists over generalists. Most project teams end up stacking two or three vendors rather than betting on one. Size doesn’t guarantee fit, either: a boutique like Green Giraffe can shape a deal more than a certification giant ever will.

FAQ

What does a renewable energy technology consultant actually do day to day?

Mostly forecasting models, DERMS configuration, grid integration studies, regulatory paperwork. Rarely swinging a hammer.

Is a bigger firm always the safer bet?

Not necessarily. Smaller outfits like Natural Power or Green Giraffe often beat bigger names on the specific project types they specialize in.

How is this different from hiring an EPC contractor?

Consultants advise and design. EPC firms build. A few, Black & Veatch among them, do both.

Do these firms only work in their home countries?

No, Fichtner and TÜV Rheinland, for instance, run projects on multiple continents at the same time.

A Primer on Biodiesel

Biodiesel is a clean burning alternative fuel produced from domestic, renewable resources. This biofuel is a mixture of fatty acid alkyl esters made from vegetable oils, animal fats or recycled greases. Where available, biodiesel can be used in compression-ignition (diesel) engines in its pure form with little or no modifications.

Biodiesel_Car

Biodiesel is simple to use, biodegradable, nontoxic, and essentially free of sulphur and aromatics. It is usually used as a petroleum diesel additive to reduce levels of particulates, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons and toxics from diesel-powered vehicles. When used as an additive, the resulting diesel fuel may be called B5, B10 or B20, representing the percentage of the biodiesel that is blended with petroleum diesel.

Biodiesel is produced through a process in which organically derived oils are combined with alcohol (ethanol or methanol) in the presence of a catalyst to form ethyl or methyl ester. The biomass-derived ethyl or methyl esters can be blended with conventional diesel fuel or used as a neat fuel (100% biodiesel). Biodiesel can be made from any vegetable oil, animal fats, waste vegetable oils, or microalgae oils.

There are three basic routes to biodiesel production from oils and fats:

  • Base catalyzed trans-esterification of the oil
  • Direct acid catalyzed trans-esterification of the oil
  • Conversion of the oil to its fatty acids and then to biodiesel.

There are a variety of oils that are used to produce biodiesel, the most common ones being soybean, rapeseed, and palm oil which make up the majority of worldwide biodiesel production. Other feedstock can come from waste vegetable oil, jatropha, mustard, flax, sunflower, palm oil or hemp.

Animal fats including tallow, lard, yellow grease, chicken fat and fish oil by-products may contribute a small percentage to biodiesel production in the future, but it is limited in supply and inefficient to raise animals for their fat. Jatropha is a small pest- and drought-resistant shrub that is capable of being grown on marginal/degraded land and produces seeds that yield several times more oil per acre than soybeans.

Jatropha_curcas

Biodiesel can be blended in any proportion with mineral diesel to create a biodiesel blend or can be used in its pure form. Just like petroleum diesel, biodiesel operates in the compression ignition (diesel) engine, and essentially requires very little or no engine modifications because the biodiesel has properties similar to mineral diesel. It can be stored just like mineral diesel and hence does not require separate infrastructure.

The use of biodiesel in conventional diesel engines results in substantial reduction in the emission of unburned hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and particulates. There are currently a large number of existing biodiesel production plants globally, and a large number under construction or planned to supply the growing global demand.

Among alternative feedstocks, algae hold enormous potential to provide a non-food, high-yield, non-arable land use source of biodiesel, ethanol and hydrogen fuels. Microalgae have been grabbing biofuel attention because on an acre-by-acre basis, microalgae can produce 100 to 300 times the oil yield of soybeans on marginal land and with salt water. Microalgae is the fastest growing photosynthesizing organism and is capable of completing an entire growing cycle every few days.

How Agricultural Sector Can Help the Renewables Sector in the Mediterranean

The continuous rise in fossil energy prices, combined with climate change concerns and progress in renewable energy sector, has catalyzed interest in clean energy systems across the MENA region, especially in the Mediterranean. The Mediterranean region has abundant renewable resources, such as wind, solar, and biomass, which makes it a fertile zone for renewable energy developments.

The agricultural sector has played a key role in the progress of renewable energy sector around the world as it provides large areas where renewable energy projects are built and is also the predominant feedstock source for biomass energy projects. For example, agricultural sector accounts for one-fifth of the total installed PV capacity in Germany.

Wind_Agriculture

The main objective of this article is to explore the role that Mediterranean agricultural sector can play in tapping tremendous renewable energy potential available across the region.

Wind Energy

In countries where there is a lack of available land to build wind turbines, the agricultural sector is playing a key role by providing enough spaces. For instance, in Denmark farmer cooperatives are diversifying their incomes by investing in wind energy. Almost a quarter of wind energy sourced from wind turbines are owned by the Danish farmers. The same trend is taking place in Germany where farmers have established private companies to develop wind energy projects. Wind farms can be built in farms without any harmful impact on agricultural activities.

Wind energy potential is abundant across the Mediterranean region due to geographical location marked by a long coastline. The integration of wind energy projects in the agricultural sector is an interesting economic opportunity for agricultural enterprises in the region. However, as wind energy projects demand heavy capital, there is a need to mobilize funds to develop such projects.

In addition, there is need to create attractive financing mechanisms for farmers and to build their capacities in developing and managing wind projects. The development of wind energy projects owned by farmers will help them to have an extra revenue stream. It will also lead to decentralization of electricity production, which will not only reduce transmission losses but also decrease reliance on the national grid.

Solar Energy

The Mediterranean region receives one of the highest solar radiation in the world. Large availability of unexploited lands in the region, especially in the Eastern and Southern countries, makes solar energy systems, especially photovoltaics an attractive proposition for regional countries.  Agricultural farms in the Mediterranean region can use PV systems for domestic as well as commercial power generation.  In addition, there are a handful of applications in agricultural sector such as water pumping and irrigation.

irrigation-rural-area

Solar power systems are increasingly becoming common in rural areas

Off-grid photovoltaic systems ensure a reliable and completely autonomous water supply at low cost – without fuel-powered generators, battery systems or long power lines. Solar energy can make irrigation independent of grid power. Low-pressure drip irrigation systems can be operated with any photovoltaic-powered pump, making them ideal for areas not connected to the grid. Photovoltaic projects require low capital investment and can be developed at small-to-medium scales.

Biomass Energy

A variety of clean fuels can be produced from agricultural biomass resources including liquid fuels, such as ethanol, methanol, biodiesel, Fischer-Tropsch diesel, and gaseous fuels, such as biogas, methane, hydrogen and methane. The agricultural resources include animal manure and crop residues derived primarily from maize, corn and small grains. A variety of regionally significant crops, such as cotton, sugarcane, rice, and fruit and nut orchards can also be a source of crop residues.

Globally, biofuels are most commonly used to power vehicles, heat homes, and for cooking. Biofuels are generally considered as offering many priorities, including sustainability, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, regional development, rural development, social structure and agriculture, and security of supply.

Jatropha-Plantation-Deseart

Jatropha Plantation in Thar Desert (India)

One of the species that is cultivated and exploited for these purposes is Jatropha curcas which is widely cultivated in Brazil and India for producing biodiesel. Jatropha can be successfully grown in arid regions of the Mediterranean for biodiesel production. These energy crops are highly useful in preventing soil erosion and shifting of sand-dunes. Infact, Jatropha is already grown at limited scale in some Middle East countries, especially Egypt,  and tremendous potential exists for its commercial exploitation.

Conclusion

The time has come for industries in the Mediterranean region, especially the agricultural sector, to undertake the shift necessary to contribute to sustainable development of the MENA region by making the best use of latest technological developments in renewable energy sector.

The Environmental Benefits of Buying Pre Owned Products

There is something satisfying about buying something new.

The box is clean. Everything is untouched. You get that little moment when you open the packaging and think, this is mine.

Fair enough.

But does everything really need to be brand new? Probably not.

Look around your home for a moment. There are probably things you have owned for years that still work perfectly well. A phone. A games console. A chair. Maybe an old laptop that spends most of its time in a cupboard.

It works.

You just don’t use it anymore.

That is where buying pre owned products can make a real difference. Instead of a perfectly usable item being forgotten, thrown out or left gathering dust, somebody else can give it another life.

pre-owned mobile phones

It is a simple idea.

Use what already exists.

Keeping Good Products in Use

One of the biggest problems with buying new all the time is that useful products can have surprisingly short lives.

A person buys a laptop. Two years later, a newer model comes out. The old laptop gets pushed into a drawer.

Nothing is wrong with it.

It just isn’t new anymore.

Someone else might still get plenty of use from it.

The same thing happens with clothes, furniture, phones, appliances and electronics. We move on before the product has really reached the end of its useful life.

Buying pre owned gives those items another chance.

And that matters because producing something from scratch takes resources. Materials have to come from somewhere. Factories have to make the parts. The finished product needs to be packaged and transported.

All of that happens before you even take it home.

Getting more years out of a product makes sense.

Less Pressure to Keep Buying New

There is always another version coming.

A newer phone. A faster computer. A different console. A slightly better television.

It can be hard not to get caught up in it.

But ask yourself something before buying: Do I need the newest version, or do I just need something that works?

There is a difference.

A pre owned product will not remove the environmental impact of its original production. That has already happened. But buying an existing product means you are giving it another use instead of automatically creating a reason to manufacture another one.

That does not sound dramatic.

It isn’t.

But small choices repeated by lots of people can add up.

Electronics Are a Big Part of the Problem

Technology is probably one of the easiest places to see this.

New devices appear constantly. Some people upgrade every couple of years, sometimes even sooner. Meanwhile, perfectly good older devices sit unused.

Gaming consoles are a good example.

Someone might upgrade to a newer system and stop using their old one. Another person may not care about having the latest model. They simply want something they can play games on without spending a fortune.

In that situation, buying an Xbox Series S from Own4Less could be a sensible option.

The important part is not the console itself.

It is what happens next.

Instead of one product sitting unused, it gets another owner. More games get played. More hours of use come from the same piece of equipment.

That is the whole point of reuse.

Keep it going.

Pre Owned Does Not Mean Broken

Some people still hear “second hand” and imagine something battered and unreliable.

That is not always fair.

People sell things for plenty of ordinary reasons.

They might be moving house. They may have upgraded. Perhaps they received something as a gift and never used it. Sometimes they simply have too much stuff.

None of that means the product is bad.

Of course, you still need to be careful. Check the condition. Read the details. Look at the specifications. Make sure the item does what you need it to do.

A cheap product that stops working a week later is not much of a bargain.

But a well looked after pre owned product?

That can be a very different story.

Reuse Deserves More Attention

Recycling gets a lot of attention when people talk about sustainability.

And yes, recycling matters.

But there is another step that often makes even more sense.

Use the thing again.

If a product still works, keeping it in use is better than rushing to replace it. You can repair it. Sell it. Give it to someone. Buy a used one yourself.

There are plenty of options.

Maybe the question before a purchase should not always be, “What’s the newest thing I can get?”

Try this instead:

“Is there already something that does the job?”

That question can change the way you shop.

It can also save money. Pre owned products are often less expensive than new ones, although the price depends on the item, condition and demand.

So you may end up spending less while also making use of something that already exists.

Not a bad result.

Businesses Can Do the Same Thing

The idea works for businesses too.

Companies replace computers, office furniture and other equipment all the time. Sometimes there is a genuine reason for it. Other times, the equipment simply no longer fits the company’s needs.

But that does not mean it has to become waste.

  • An old computer might still be useful to another team.
  • A desk could be used in another office.
  • Equipment that is no longer needed could be sold, rather than left in storage until nobody remembers why it is there.

It is worth asking before throwing something away.

Can someone else still use this?

The answer might be yes.

Sustainability Starts With Ordinary Choices

You do not need to make every part of your life perfectly sustainable. That is unrealistic.

Most people have busy lives. They buy things. They replace things. Sometimes convenience wins.

What matters is being a little more aware of what we already have.

  • Repair something when it makes sense.
  • Buy used when you do not need new.
  • Pass things on when you no longer need them.
  • Think before replacing something that still works.

None of this is going to fix the environmental problems we face overnight.

But it does help change the way we think about products.

An item does not suddenly become worthless because someone else owned it first.

  • A phone can have another owner.
  • A games console can have another owner.
  • A laptop can have another owner.

And sometimes, that is all it needs.

Buying pre owned is not about being perfect. It is about making better use of what is already here.

Less waste.

More use.

And, quite often, a little more money left in your pocket.

Waste Management Awareness in Oman: A Survey

The four Rs (reduce, reuse, repurpose, and recycle) of waste management have not yet entered the everyday discourse of Oman, but does this mean that they are not part of everyday life in Oman? We think the people of Oman can help us to answer this question. To get a first-hand understanding of the degree of waste management awareness in Oman, a pilot study was designed, a questionnaire was prepared, and in a series of interviews with individual Omanis we recorded their responses.

waste-oman

Insights into Waste Awareness Survey

The questionnaire covered household consumption habits, food waste and other household waste, and awareness of the four Rs, with particular attention to recycling. The main focus of the survey was on food waste. Of the 21 questions, fifteen were multiple-choice, with write-in options for any needed explanation. There were six open-ended questions, inviting respondents to give their opinion or share something of their experiences and knowledge of the topic.

The respondents were all adult Omani nationals, ranging in age from their early twenties to their late fifties. All respondents reside in Muscat, but the majority were originally from other provinces and maintained a strong connection with their home village or town. The respondents represented various occupations such as: university student, homemaker, bank clerk, teacher, taxi driver and police officer. The interviews were carried out in March and April 2016.

Who take care of grocery shopping?

60 percent of respondents said that in their household, the wife usually took care of the grocery shopping. 20 percent said the husband had that responsibility, and another 20 percent said that both husband and wife regularly did the grocery shopping together. When asked how often (monthly, weekly, daily, or not regularly) the grocery shopping was done in their households, most respondents said that it depended on the commodity.

Dry goods such as rice, pulses, flour, sugar, and coffee were purchased in larger quantities on a monthly basis, while most households shopped for fruits, vegetables, milk and bread at least once a week.

Do you prefer to buy food in bulk or pre-packaged?

In response to this question: Do you prefer to buy food in bulk (by the gram/kilogram) or pre-packaged? they answered patiently (but clearly some thought it was a silly question) that of course “it depends on the type of food.” Some foods were fresher and cheaper in bulk, whereas other foods were cleaner and free of impurities when packaged at the factory.

80 percent of respondents stated that they shopped at a supermarket for most of their household groceries; 50 percent of them said that they regularly shopped at an outdoor market (such as a fish or vegetable market) for certain commodities. No respondents said that they relied on small shops for their grocery shopping.

A few of the middle-aged respondents recalled that when they were children, there was not much choice when one went to the market. Their parents could buy staples such as rice, flour, tea, coffee and sugar, and a few varieties of greens and fruits. Nowadays, one of them remarked, shopping at the supermarket they had trouble deciding between the many processed and packaged products on offer, such as cheeses, yoghurt, juices, sweets, and imported fresh and frozen meats and other produce.

70 percent of those surveyed said they used the free ‘disposable’ plastic bags dispensed by the shops, and only 30 percent took their own reusable fabric bag or other reusable receptacle to do their shopping. However, those who did go to the outdoor markets said they often brought their own cartons or plastic vegetable crates in order to carry the produce home in their cars.

When asked what their parents or grandparents had used for their shopping, 40 percent said “a basket” and 60 percent said “a box” (meaning either a vegetable crate or a carton). Apparently plastic bags were not an option in “the old days.”

Do you find that your household ends up throwing out food?

The interviewer mentioned to each respondent the statistics that came from the 2012 Sultan Qaboos University study on household food waste in Oman, and posed this question: Do you find that your household/family ends up throwing out food that was not eaten before it spoiled? The responses were somewhat unexpected.

Only 30 percent reported that their household regularly had to throw away uneaten food. The other 70 percent said that when there was any food left over from a family meal or a child’s dish, it was fed to animals such as chickens and goats. Several female respondents mentioned that in general they only prepared enough food to feed their own family and perhaps to send a plateful of it to a neighbour.

solid-waste-oman

In a big city no one notices what you throw in your rubbish bin

The exception to this pattern was when they had guests, in which case it was compulsory to prepare greater quantities than usual. Respondents who brought up the subject of hosting and special occasions explained that in Omani culture it was considered a sign of respect for their guests and a point of honour for their family if they served more food than the guests could actually eat.

Therefore, weddings, the arrival of a newborn, the two Eids and other celebrations could be expected to result in substantial quantities of wasted food. However, according to several respondents, “back in the village” this is not what happened. Tribal and local municipal regulations actually prohibited the disposal of large quantities of food waste at dumpsites.

The main reason given was that leaving leftover food outside was “bad for the livestock.” That is, a camel will naturally eat as much food as it finds, and if discarded food such as rice is left out in the open, the camel will continue to eat until it gets sick. This surprising claim about camels eating cooked rice seems to be supported by scientific research: “Yagil (1990) observed that camels selected feed which is highly digestible, especially rich in easily fermentable carbohydrates and having high water contents [sic].” Cooked rice fits all three criteria.

Furthermore, camels are proficient at “eating in excess of their immediate needs and storing the extra as fat in the hump.” So out of necessity to protect the health of the camels, it was forbidden to scatter uneaten food. Instead, whoever hosted an event at which quantities of excess food remained would take the food immediately to any nearby encampment of migrant workers and distribute it there. Alternatively, the hosts would distribute it to needy families in their community. If it was not possible to donate the leftover food to others, it was dried in the sun to preserve it and then fed in small quantities to livestock such as goats and chickens.

Comparison between ‘Now’ and ‘Then’

When asked to compare the level of household food waste generated today and when they were children, there was unanimous agreement among respondents that either no or little food was ever wasted “back then,” whereas modern-day urban living has made it harder to avoid wasting food. The respondent above-mentioned who had remarked on the great variety of options available in supermarkets posited that this meant that people ended up buying more than they could practically consume.

Another factor suggested by respondents as leading to increased food waste is simply living in a big city where no one notices what you throw in your rubbish bin: back in the village or small town, neighbours would know exactly what your family has tossed into the local dump, so there was a sort of peer pressure against food waste.

What type of drinking water does your household consume?

As a follow-on to consumption patterns for food, the survey asked what type of drinking water each household consumed. In most parts of Oman, it is assumed that tap water is not safe for drinking. 80 percent of respondents said they subscribed to a commercial service for drinking water. Of those, two-thirds purchased refillable water dispensers (such as Salsabeel, a local brand), usually delivered to their homes as part of the service; one-third bought water from the ubiquitous blue tanker trucks that also deliver to residences in Muscat and other cities and towns.  No households in the survey used non-refillable plastic water bottles (such as Masafi or Oasis brand) as their primary source of drinking water, but thirty percent said they used them on occasion, especially when travelling by road.

water-bottles-middle-east

Interviewees were asked which of these components (food, plastic packaging/bags, paper/cardboard, plastic bottles or “other”) made up most of the refuse found in their own household rubbish bins. Half of them asserted it was plastic packaging or plastic bags, one-third believed it to be paper and/or cardboard, and the remaining respondents said it was plastic bottles (such as containers for juice, water and household disinfectants).

Are you aware of any local programme for recycling?

The questions about plastic water bottles and what types of material were trashed led to this next query: Are you aware of any local programme for recycling? Only twenty percent of respondents answered “Yes,” and of those, none were aware of any active recycling programme in their neighbourhood or workplace. One respondent thought that the 2013 Dar al Atta’a clothing recycling initiative was still ongoing, because the bins for paper and cardboard recycling set up by the same charity around Muscat in 2015 looked almost identical to those previous bins for clothing.

recycling-program-Oman

A few respondents had heard that plastic bottles were being collected somewhere in the city, but had no idea where. Several respondents mentioned that in the past, they used to see individuals salvaging empty aluminium soft drink cans from municipal rubbish bins near streets and in public parks. A couple of these respondents noted that the remuneration price for those used cans had fallen several years ago, and they believed this to be the reason this type of recycling seemed to have disappeared.

Do you recycle any of these items?

The follow-on question was: Do you recycle any of these items? paper/cardboard, plastic bottles, aluminium/metal, glass, clothing or “other”. The category “other” was intended to catch possible but expectedly rare responses such as batteries, electronics and printer ink cartridges. One would think that this follow-up question would have received “Not applicable” as a response from all respondents. However, a few respondents mentioned that they “recycled” some of their own household’s waste, in that they re-used or repurposed items such as cardboard boxes, plastic bottles, glass jars and old tee shirts. Most (70 percent) said that they regularly donated used clothing to poor families or (especially with children’s clothing) gave them to relatives.

This question spurred a couple of female respondents to comment on clothing “waste” as a problem “particular to Omanis,” as they saw it. They mentioned that Omanis who wear traditional clothing must have most of their clothes tailor made, and that—particularly for women’s wear—the fashions changed quickly from season to season. As a result, many women and girls felt they could not be seen wearing last season’s dresses and scarves, and had to buy the latest styles.

One respondent further remarked that the cycle of conspicuous consumption was affecting Omani society at many levels, and was even more problematic when it involved costly commodities such as mobile phones, especially on the part of the youth, who junked their “old” phones for the latest models with astonishing frequency.

What factors influenced the beliefs and attitudes about wasting food or throwing away useful items?

Interviewees were asked what factors influenced their beliefs and attitudes about wasting food or throwing away useful items. Sixty percent said that religion (Islam) played the greatest role in this. Thirty percent said family upbringing was the main influence and another ten percent attributed their attitudes to their culture. Education and tradition were mentioned by the majority of respondents as the secondary factors.

What do you think that people in Oman can do to help reduce the amount of waste they are making?

The final question in the survey was: What do you think that people in Oman can do to help reduce the amount of waste they are making? This open-ended question elicited a variety of responses: “Be responsible for yourself and your family”; “don’t buy more than you need”; “donate extra food and clothing instead of throwing it away”; and “re-use items in your home and at your farm.”

Note: This is the second article in our special series on ‘Waste Management in Oman’. The first part can be read at this link.

The third and final part analyses the results of the survey and makes a wide range of recommendations to improve the waste management situation in Oman.

الإيمان والعمل البيئي في الشرق الأوسط وشمال إفريقيا

أدركت مبادرة الإيمان من أجل الأرض التي أطلقها برنامج الأمم المتحدة للبيئة، أهمية دور المنظمات الدينية حول العالم في توجيه جهود التصدي للتغير المناخي. يؤمن 84% من سكان العالم بوجود قوة إلهية تتجسد في مجموعة من المبادئ والقيم. لذلك، تتمتع المنظمات والقيادات الدينية بقدرة كبيرة على توجيه العمل اليومي للأفراد المتدينين. كل الديانات السماوية تدعو إلى العبادة واحترام الطبيعة التي هي من خلق الله.

solar-mosque

أهمية العلاقة بين الإيمان والبيئة

تستطيع القيادات الدينية المساهمة في بناء القدرات والتوعية والتعليم، وبالتالي ترجمة الحس بالمسؤولية نحو البيئة الى ممارسات عملية على أرض الواقع. يقع على عاتق حكومة بعض الدول ذات التوجهات الدينية، مسؤولية وضع السياسات التي تساهم في الاستدامة وحماية البيئة بالانسجام مع المعتقدات الدينية.

توصف المنظمات الدينية بأنها رابع أقوى قوة اقتصادية في العالم. ويمكن فهم القوة التي تتمتع بها تلك المنظمات من خلال هذه الأمثلة على ما يقع ضمن إشراف هذه المؤسسات:

  • 37 مليون كنيسة
  • 4 مليون مسجد
  • الملايين من المعابد
  • 5% من مجموع الغابات ذات الإنتاجية التجارية في العالم، منها 30% تقع في أوروبا
  • 10% من المؤسسات المالية

وعلى سبيل المثال، تساهم قرارات القيادات الدينية لدمج الاستدامة في التصميم المعماري والبناء كاستخدام الألواح الشمسية وإدارة المياه وإدارة المخلفات في تعزيز مبادئ الاقتصاد الأخضر ومن ثم توزيع الفائض من تلك الموارد على المجتمعات المحلية.

الحراك الديني البيئي

كان العام 2015 عاما بارزا للعمل البيئي على مستوى العالم.  فعلاوة على اتفاقية باريس التي التزمت من خلالها 195 دولة إضافة إلى الاتحاد الأوروبي بالعمل نحو مستقبل مستدام منخفض الانبعاثات الكربونية، أطلق العديد من القيادات الدينية دعوات للعمل على حماية الأرض والبشرية من الآثار المدمرة للتغير المناخي.

  • في العام 2015، دعا قداسة البابا فرنسيس في رسالته البابوية “Laudato Si” التي تستعرض المسؤولية الأخلاقية ل 1.2 مليار كاثوليكي إلى إدراك أهمية الأزمة المناخية.
  • وفي نفس العام في مدينة إسطنبول وخلالالندوة العالمية الإسلامية حول التغير المناخي، تبنى القادة الاسلاميون بمن فيهم رجال الدين وصناع السياسات والأكاديميون الإعلان الإسلامي للمناخ. ولكن على خلاف ما حدث في روما وبسبب عدم وجود مؤسسة مركزية قوية تدعم السياسات التي تضمنها الإعلان، لم يحظ الإعلان الإسلامي بالانتشار والدعم المطلوب.
  • في شهر حزيران من العام 2020, افتتح مشروع “The living Chapel” في حديقة “Orto Botanico” في روما للترويج للرسالة البابوية “Laudato Si” وللأجندة العالمية للتنمية المستدامة 2030 التي أطلقتها الأمم المتحدة.

إضافة لما سبق، كان هناك ايضا الإعلان البوذي للتغير المناخي، واصدار الرسائل الربانية عن التغير المناخي من مئات الحاخامات والقادة الهندوسيين الذين انضموا لهذا الزخم البيئي العالمي.

ماذا عن منطقة الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا؟

عقد برنامج الأمم المتحدة للبيئة حوارات مع العديد من المنظمات الدينية في المنطقة كجزء من مبادرة الإيمان من أجل الأرض. وتتضمن الاستراتيجية المحدثة عددا من الشراكات مع مجلس وزراء البيئة لدول العالم الإسلامي في المنظمة الإسلامية للتربية والعلوم والثقافة (إيسيسكو)، ومؤسسة قطر، وحديقة القرآن النباتية في قطر، وكلية الدراسات الإسلامية بجامعة حمد بن خليفة؛ والتي تهدف بمجملها إلى تصميم ميثاق إسلامي مدعوم مؤسسيا يتعلق بقضايا التغير المناخي واستعادة النظم البيئية، والحلول القائمة على الطبيعة، والاقتصاد الأخضر، والأخلاقيات البيئية.

يقع على عاتق الأكاديميين وصناع القرار ورجال الدين مسؤولية كبرى نحو دمج التنمية الاقتصادية مع الاستدامة البيئية. شدد الدكتور اياد أبو مغلي – مدير مبادرة الإيمان من أجل الأرض – على الدور القيادي الذي يمكن أن يقوم به رجال الدين في تحفيز المجتمع الإسلامي للحفاظ على البيئة والاستخدام المسؤول للموارد الطبيعة المتنوعة التي تتمتع بها منطقة الشرق الأوسط. وكان للدكتور أبو مغلي نظرة متفائلة تجاه الطلاب والشباب للمشاركة في العمل والحراك البيئي، والتي تتجاوز التبرعات المالية البسيطة نحو مساءلة أكبر للقيادات في دولهم.

ترجمه: سامر فاخوري

طالب هندسة صناعية في الجامعة الأردنية، مهتم بمجال التنمية المستدامة وطرق دمج النهج الهندسي مع تطبيقات التنمية المستدامة في الواقع العملي. شارك في العديد من مشاريع المنظمات غير الحكومية المحلية والعالمية إيمانا بضرورة خلق بيئة مستدامة لجميع مواطني الأرض. يشارك حاليا في مشروع التخرج الذي يتطرق الى قضية الأمن الغذائي في العالم وطرق جديدة عصرية للوصول الى أحقية توفر الغذاء لجميع سكان الأرض.

Note: This article was originally published by egomonk on egomonk insights. The curator and host of this series is Ruba Al Zu’bi

Smoke Odor Removal: Causes, Solutions, and Prevention

Smoke is one of the most tenacious smells in the house. It endures scrubbing, resists air fresheners, and comes back on humid afternoons when you thought it was long gone. That is why the smoke odor removal in Singapore that homeowners are looking into is seldom resolved within a weekend. The residue of smoke has a physical effect that lingers to release odor months later, and our warm and damp climate contributes to its permanence.

This manual tells you the origin of the smell, its remedies, and the prevention of its recurrence.

smoke odor removal

Why Does Smoke Smell Linger So Long

Material burning emits tiny particles and oily substances. These carry away warm air and are deposited upon cooler surfaces and percolate through permeable materials.

The nicotine residue, tar, and other compounds are a sticky film left behind by cigarette smoke. Soot is a byproduct of fire smoke, and is carbon-based and acidic enough to leave a stain when left too long on surfaces.

Settled that the film is reactivated by heat and humidity. It emits odor into the room on a hot day or when the air conditioner turns off. Scientists refer to this residual contamination as third-hand smoke, and this is why a room reeks of cigarettes even after nobody smoked in the room.

Common Causes in Local Homes and Buildings

Indoor Smoking by Previous Occupants

This is what makes people most often seek cigarette smoke odor removal Singapore services. When the furniture of the previous occupant is removed, and the unit is sealed, it is usually noticed by buyers and new tenants only.

Fire, Burnt Cooking, and Electrical Faults

A dry pot on the stove, a kitchen fire, or an overheated appliance can contaminate an entire flat in minutes. Cases of Fire smoke odor removal in Singapore are more difficult since the soot is spread throughout the air path rather than in a single room.

Smoke Drifting Between Units

In overpopulated housing, the smoke gets inside via windows, service ducts, bathroom exhausts, and door apertures. The source is not within your house, and cleaning will work partially until the entry point has been closed.

Incense, Candles, and Ritual Burning

The fact that burning inside the house leaves behind a sludge makes it easy to ignore it until the odor takes hold.

Where Smoke Odor Hides

Effective smoke smell removal depends on treating every layer, not just the obvious surfaces.

  • Fine tar film is coated on walls and paint, and particularly on the areas above the head.
  • Ceilings get the greatest amount of residue, as the smoke ascends and settles there.
  • Smoke is drawn into the foam in upholstery, mattresses, and cushions.
  • Curtains and blinds entrap odor in folds of fabric.
  • Fibres and underlay are in carpets and rugs.
  • Clothes in the wardrobe, drawers, and clothes.
  • Cabinets with lampshades, books, and paper.
  • The HVAC system comprises filters, ducting, and fan coil units.

Avoiding each of these is what makes a thorough clean still smell faintly.

What You Can Do Yourself

Light or proximate exposure tends to react to diligent DIY efforts, and lots of homes succeed in removing the smoke smell Singapore flats acquire among neighbours by doing so.

Ventilate hard: Open windows on opposite sides to facilitate air cross-flow and place a fan facing out. Do not do it in hours or days.

Wash everything washable: Bedding, cushion covers, and curtains are usually necessary, as well as clothing. The first wash should have a cup of white vinegar.

Wash hard surfaces: Apply a mild alkaline degreaser on walls, doors, skirtings, and cabinet interiors. Work down the line and run under, instead of rubbing dirt about.

Service the air path: The system continues to spread odor; replace air-con filters, clean fan coil units, and vacuum vents.

Adsorb, not perfume: Odor molecules are captured in bowls of either activated carbon or zeolite. Another layer is the use of scented sprays.

Deep clean soft furnishings: The extraction of hot water on carpets and upholstery gets rid of much more than vacuuming.

Professional Smoke Odor Removal Methods

When residue has built up for years, or after a fire, specialists in professional smoke odor removal in Singapore use equipment that is not practical at home.

Assessment and Source Mapping

Technicians examine the materials, whether they are contaminated, the distance that the soot travelled, and the presence of moisture. Water damage and smoke damage usually imply concealed mould, which requires individual intervention.

Cleaning and Removal of Materials

Carpet underlays, ceiling boards, insulation, and mattresses are often replaced as opposed to being washed. This is the best step most of the time.

Duct and system cleaning.

Ducting, diffusers, and coils are washed to prevent recontamination, and filters are replaced where feasible.

Ozone Treatment and Hydroxyl Systems.

Ozone treatment is the best way to eliminate odor compounds; however, this is effective in empty spaces only. Ozone causes irritation to the lungs, damages rubber and some plastics, and requires a clearance period before reoccupancy. Hydroxyl generators operate more slowly and can be used in occupied spaces.

Sealing and Encapsulation

A shellac-based or specialist sealer is used after cleaning to entrap the remaining odor in the wall and ceiling surfaces. Painting on dirty walls is hardly ever a good idea, as the film seeps through.

Final Odor Neutralization

Enzyme treatments and thermal fogging deal with any remaining smell in furniture and concealed spaces. Odor neutralization involves proper modification of the compounds instead of covering them.

HDB Flats, Condominiums, and Commercial Spaces

Work done by HDB smoke odor removal commonly entails the use of shared ventilation shafts and neighbour drift; sealing duct openings and bathroom vents are equally important as cleaning. Get in touch with your Town Council in case the smoke continues to enter the common area.

The cases of condo smoke odor removal tend to be associated with an airtight, air-conditioned design. The odor accumulates due to the low exchange of fresh air and disperses via the fan coil networks.

The most opportune time would be before a renovation, when walls and ceilings are available for residential odor removal in Singapore projects. The addition of staff and customer factors, and bigger duct systems that require liaison with the building management, are part of commercial smoke odor removal work.

Health and Safety Considerations

Residual tobacco smoke has known harmful substances, and the health authorities recommend a reduction of exposure, particularly to children, pregnant women, and asthmatic people. Soots may also irritate the airways. Any person who has persistent symptoms should visit a physician.

Practical safety points:

  • Wear gloves and a mask when cleaning soot.
  • Never mix bleach with acidic or ammonia-based cleaners
  • Do not operate ozone equipment when there are people or pets about.
  • Address any electrical fire damage as an inspection issue first.
  • Elimination of residue will also enhance indoor air quality for all people in the house.

Frequently Asked Questions About Odor Removal

1. Time to remove the smoke smell?

Answer: Light cases are cleared in days. It takes one to three weeks to correct long-term smoking or fire damage, including the replacement of materials and sealing.

2. Is a repaint the answer?

Answer: Not by itself. The residue should be washed and then covered. Otherwise, the smell permeates the new paint.

3. Are air purifiers effective?

Answer: Yes, as support. Carbon-based units have been shown to minimize air odor and are unable to clean contaminated surfaces.

4. Am I allowed to remain at home in treatment?

Answer: With good ventilation, occupancy is generally permitted. Ozone treatment must be in a space.

Final Thoughts

The smell of smoke lingers on since the soot remains. Effective smoke odor removal is performed in a definite sequence: the ventilation, cleaning of all layers, replacement of things that are impossible to clean, service of the air system, and then sealing and neutralising. The exposure to light tends to react to DIY work, whereas fire damage, indoor smoking over several years, or a situation that deals with moisture and mold requires evaluation by a professional. Early interventions are much cheaper than re-intervention.

Impact of Anthropogenic Climate Change on Major Ecosystems

Anthropogenic climate change is hindering a wide variety of organisms, their genetics and species’ habitats – in short, biodiversity. The accelerated pace of human development and its impacts on biodiversity which sustain it, is both massive and significant. Biodiversity is inextricably linked to climate; climate change is both a cause and an effect of biodiversity change. Climate change jeopardizes the services offered by the global ecosystems that have been taken for granted.

Let us examine how anthropogenic climate change is affecting various ecosystems:

climate-change-ecosystems

Agricultural Ecosystem

Agricultural ecosystems are spread around the globe; hence, the impacts of climate change on agricultural biodiversity will be diverse and extensive. Climate change is threatening plant growth and production due to proliferation of pests and diseases, wildfires, yield reduction due to extreme weather, and changes in rainfall patterns.

Other risks include nutrients leaching from the soil during intense rains, and greater erosion due to stronger winds, while livestock will be negatively affected by rising temperature, disease and weather extremes.

Forest Ecosystem

Forests cover one-third of Earth’s surface and host two-thirds of all known terrestrial species. Changing climatic conditions may cause frequent forest fires and create conditions favorable to pests; both will lead to degradation and loss of biodiversity.

Marine and Coastal Ecosystems

Oceans cover 70% of Earth’s surface area, forming the largest habitat on Earth; which has some of the world’s most diverse and productive ecosystems, including coral reefs.

The key threats facing the unique entity of ocean by climate change include:

  1. Rise in sea level: On coastal margins, rising sea levels may lead to an important coastal habitat reduction such as salt marshes.
  2. Warmer oceans: Rising sea temperatures will lead to increase coastal erosion, extensive coastal flooding events and reducing sea-ice cover. Furthermore, it will affect the species composition and distribution and survival of particular marine resources. Corals reef is a good example, as minor increases in temperature causes coral bleaching leading to loss of coral reef structure and impact negatively on the coral reef ecosystem.
  3. Increased acidification: as the ocean absorbs atmospheric CO2; it becomes more acidic. Increasing acidification of the ocean due to climate change, has made it difficult for coral polyps to capture water`s calcium. Consequently, coral reefs, face bleaching (whitening and death) at large-scale levels.

acidification-water-bodies

Polar Ecosystem

Climate change is having the most visible and significant impacts on the polar ecosystems. Escalating melting of ice sheets and glaciers is affecting native people, wildlife and plants in the Polar Regions. Melting glaciers and ice are leading to further release of greenhouse gases and contributing to sea levels rising, threatening many areas with coastal flooding, increasing in beach erosion, and contaminating fresh water supplies.

Furthermore, climate change has devastating effects on polar species, such as: Polar bears, whales, walrus, and seals, which struggle to adapt to the destructive effects of climate change including habitat degradation, changing feeding and migrating patterns. Moreover, warming of areas of the polar oceans in the Antarctic has had a negative impact on the plankton community composition and distribution that support a rich marine food chain.

Mountain Ecosystems

Some plant species showed shifting in distribution, while other plants previously found on mountaintops have disappeared due to climate change. The shrinking of glaciers result from climate change has led to changes in mountains capacities of holding water, hence affecting downstream ecosystems.

Island Ecosystems

Island ecosystems are fragile and characterized by a high biodiversity. The climate change threats the island ecosystems by rising sea level and massive coral bleaching. Island ecosystems also might suffer from reducing rainfall, an increased frequency and/or intensity of storms, and intolerable high temperatures.

Microbial Ecosystems

Microbes are central to all life on earth; Microbes perform different significant functions for ecosystems. Little is known about how climate change will impact microbial communities, hence, accumulating evidences show that climate change can hinder specific properties of entire microbial communities and ecosystem functioning. A recent study has shown that soil microbes alter DNA in response to climate change, therefore affecting microbial influence on soil carbon storage and other greenhouse gases.

microbial-biodiversity

Recent researches have also shown an increased in microbial-mediated disease impacts in both the terrestrial and marine ecosystems, due to changes in distributing of existing infectious disease vectors, and the seasonal distribution of some allergens pollen species Additionally, evidences show that changes in climate alter certain properties of microbial communities, which eventually have enormous impacts on the food chain supported by the microbes.

Climate Change Impacts on Biodiversity

The future projection of climate change in the Arabia shows a hot, dry future; researches predict more severe droughts, desertification, shifting of ecosystems and species loss. Furthermore, climate change will lead to a significant heat stress and a severe water shortage, hence, Middle East is identified as the first region to run out of fresh water in the globe.

biodiversity_jordan

Generally, terrestrial biodiversity in Middle East will suffer the greatest decrease as a result of climate change, while marine ecosystems will suffer from increase in sea levels, changing circulation patterns, changing the biological characteristics, increasing in invasive species, and the marine ecosystems will become more tropical.

Conclusion

Anthropogenic climate change is affecting different organisms in different ecosystems. The IPCC’s 2007 calculations estimated that greenhouse gas emissions would need to be reduced by at least 80% by 2050 to avoid the devastating impacts of climate change. Since humans have created this problem, it is our moral responsibility to solve it. Governments need to improve the resilience of their communities to existing impacts of the changes in the climate; by doing so, they can enhance the prosperity and sustainability of present and future generations.

Additionally, energy production from burning fossil fuels produces about 80 % of the global CO2 emissions, thus renewable energy is a desirable alternative for reducing human impacts on climate change while protecting biodiversity. Further research should be undertaken to broaden our perspective on the impact of climate change on different ecosystems, with an effective communicating platform to share information, experience and knowledge in climate change mitigation and adaptation.

El Niño, Your Leftovers, and the Methane Problem Hiding in Plain Sight

A limp celery stalk, a banana peel or yesterday’s rice hardly looks like a climate problem. Once those scraps disappear into the kitchen trash, most of us stop thinking about them. Yet food does not disappear when it leaves the kitchen: it enters a waste management system, and if that system ends in a landfill, the climate consequences can be surprisingly significant.

That may seem far removed from El Niño, but the connection is worth examining carefully. Food waste does not cause El Niño, and composting cannot control it. El Niño is a natural Pacific Ocean-atmosphere cycle. The connection is broader: a powerful El Niño shows how vulnerable food, water and soil systems can become when natural climate variability operates on top of a warmer global climate, while food waste is one example of an avoidable emissions source we can actually influence.

food waste in a bin

El Niño 2026 is becoming a serious climate story

By August 2026, El Niño was already established and strengthening across the tropical Pacific. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center now gives a greater than 90% chance that the event becomes “very strong” during Northern Hemisphere fall and winter 2026–27. For October through December, NOAA also gives a 69% chance that the Relative Oceanic Niño Index, or RONI, reaches +2.5°C or higher, a level NOAA says could exceed previous El Niño events in its record dating back to 1950. The latest official discussion is available from NOAA Climate Prediction Center.

The forecast has revived headlines about a possible “super El Niño,” although that is not an official NOAA category. NOAA classifies El Niño events as weak, moderate, strong or very strong. The important point is not the nickname but the scale of the event now being forecast.

El Nino in 2026

Figure 1. August 2026 El Niño forecast summary. The embedded figure summarizes NOAA CPC probabilities and NOAA GFDL experimental guidance; the original NOAA forecast page and model figure are linked below.

Source: NOAA GFDL – August 2026 El Niño Predictions

NOAA describes ENSO, the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, as one of the most influential sources of year-to-year climate variability on Earth. Changes in tropical Pacific sea-surface temperatures alter rainfall, winds and atmospheric circulation well beyond the Pacific itself. A strong El Niño can shift the Pacific jet stream and increase winter storm activity across California and parts of the southern United States, while other regions, including Australia, Indonesia and parts of southern Asia, can face greater drought risk. NOAA’s plain-language explainer is available at Understanding El Niño.

The effects are not uniform, and El Niño should not be blamed for every flood, drought, heatwave or hurricane that occurs during an El Niño year. What it does is change the probability of particular weather patterns and extremes. In the Atlantic, for example, El Niño typically increases vertical wind shear, which tends to suppress hurricane activity, while parts of the central and eastern Pacific can become more favorable for tropical cyclones.

When a climate pattern becomes an economic problem

The importance of El Niño becomes clearer when the climate signal reaches agriculture and infrastructure. A displaced storm track can mean saturated farmland, erosion and delayed harvests; reduced rainfall can mean depleted reservoirs, irrigation restrictions and crop stress; abnormal heat can affect livestock, electricity demand and public health. Those effects do not stop at the farm gate. They move through commodity markets, insurance systems, transportation networks and household food prices.

A 2023 study in Nature Communications estimated that the economic effects of major El Niño events can persist for years. Under the authors’ statistical framework, the 1997–98 event was associated with roughly $2.1 trillion in cumulative global economic losses, while the 2015–16 event was associated with about $3.9 trillion over the event year and the following three years. Those are modeled estimates rather than a direct tally of disaster losses, but they illustrate why ENSO belongs in conversations about food security, water management and economic resilience. Read the study.

Climate change adds another layer. El Niño itself is natural; human greenhouse gas emissions did not create ENSO. At the same time, the IPCC assesses that ENSO will remain a dominant source of interannual climate variability in a warmer world and that ENSO-related rainfall variability is likely to intensify as the climate warms. Natural variability and human-caused warming are therefore different processes, but they increasingly operate together. IPCC AR6 Working Group I, Chapter 4 provides the broader assessment.

That leaves society with two parallel tasks: adapting to climate extremes and reducing avoidable greenhouse gas emissions. Food waste belongs in the second category.

Food waste is also a methane problem

In the United States, food waste accounts for roughly 24% of municipal solid waste disposed of in landfills, yet EPA estimates that landfilled food is responsible for approximately 58% of fugitive methane emissions from U.S. municipal solid waste landfills. The imbalance is partly explained by the speed at which food decomposes. Once buried in oxygen-poor landfill conditions, organic matter undergoes anaerobic decomposition and generates methane. Food can begin producing methane before landfill-gas collection systems are operating at full effectiveness, and EPA estimates that about 61% of methane generated by landfilled food waste is not captured.

food waste in USA landfills

Figure 2. Food waste is disproportionately important to landfill methane. The embedded visualization summarizes EPA’s national estimate; the original EPA landfill-methane graphic and report are linked below.

Source: U.S. EPA – Quantifying Methane Emissions from Landfilled Food Waste

Methane matters particularly in the near term because it traps substantially more heat than carbon dioxide over a 20-year time horizon. This does not mean that one discarded meal meaningfully changes the climate on its own. It means that millions of tons of rapidly decomposing organic material entering landfills create a large, avoidable methane source. The practical question is therefore not simply how much smaller we can make food waste, but where the material ultimately goes.

The “electric composter” category has a definition problem

The household food waste appliance market has made this issue more confusing by grouping very different technologies under labels such as “electric composter.” Some appliances maintain an aerobic biological environment in which microorganisms actively decompose organic material. Others rely primarily on heat, grinding and dehydration to remove water and reduce the weight and volume of scraps. Both approaches can solve practical household problems, but they are not the same biological process and should not automatically be treated as environmentally equivalent.

EPA defines composting as managed, aerobic biological decomposition of organic materials by microorganisms. It separately explains that residential grinding and dehydrating appliances reduce the weight and volume of food scraps but do not produce compost. Their output remains a dried food material that needs further composting, curing or another appropriate downstream treatment. EPA’s Composting at Home guidance makes that distinction explicit.

That does not make dehydration useless. Removing water can reduce storage volume, odor and transportation weight, which may be valuable in certain settings. The limitation is that physical reduction alone does not demonstrate landfill diversion. If dried food scraps ultimately go into general trash and then to landfill, the material may be smaller and lighter, but the waste pathway has not necessarily changed in a way that creates a climate benefit.

Climate performance depends on the whole system

A credible comparison between food waste management technologies has to account for more than the appearance of the final material. Electricity use, manufacturing, transportation, process emissions and the ultimate destination of the output can all affect the result. Thermal dehydration consumes energy to evaporate water, managed composting can also use electricity or fuel, and poorly aerated compost can generate methane or nitrous oxide. None of these factors automatically disqualifies a technology, but they show why a product cannot be judged simply by the word “composter” on its packaging.

A review and meta-analysis of 82 studies, mostly life-cycle assessments, published in Waste Management, found sufficient comparative evidence to conclude that aerobic composting and anaerobic digestion performed better than waste-to-energy and landfill-gas-to-energy for climate-change impacts in the studies reviewed. At the same time, the authors emphasized large differences in system boundaries and found that no single treatment option performed best across every environmental category. The study is indexed at PubMed.

That kind of nuance is not a weakness in environmental analysis; it is precisely what makes lifecycle claims credible.

What composting adds is a soil pathway

Avoiding landfill methane is only one part of the value of composting. The other is what happens when properly processed organic matter returns to land. EPA’s recent scientific review concludes that the research literature broadly supports compost application as a way to improve soil health. Documented benefits include higher organic matter, improved water infiltration and retention, lower soil compaction, reduced erosion and greater resilience to drought and heavy rainfall.

composting as climate mitigation

Figure 3. Composting as climate mitigation and soil resilience. The embedded summary reflects findings synthesized by EPA; the original EPA “Benefits of Applying Compost” graphic and report are linked below.

Source: U.S. EPA – Environmental Value of Applying Compost

EPA’s synthesis also estimates an approximately 78% reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions when food waste is composted and land applied rather than landfilled, together with more than three times greater carbon sequestration in the same pathway comparison. Those figures require an important qualification: they describe a waste management pathway comparison across studies reviewed by EPA; they are not a universal carbon-reduction factor that can be attached to any compost pile, municipal program or household appliance.

The broader mechanism is nevertheless important. Properly managed composting can contribute to climate mitigation by reducing exposure to landfill methane, while appropriate compost use can improve the ability of soils to manage both water scarcity and heavy rainfall.

Household technology is beginning to reflect the distinction

In 2026, Digital Trends conducted a multiweek household test of GEME Terra 2 and explicitly distinguished its microbial-decomposition approach from food recyclers that primarily dry and grind scraps. Terra 2 and the higher-capacity GEME Pro both use Continuous Aerobic Microbial Composting, maintaining a living microbial environment with managed heat, moisture, airflow and mixing rather than relying mainly on dehydration.

The two systems apply the same biological approach at different household scales. Terra 2 is optimized for households of 1–3 people and up to 2 kg of food scraps per day, while GEME Pro is designed for households of 4+ people and heavier daily loads, with capacity of up to 5 kg per day. Digital Trends tested Terra 2 in a five-person household, above the recommended household size for that model. The review is therefore useful not only for confirming the system’s microbial-decomposition approach, but also for illustrating why matching processing capacity to household food-waste volume matters in a continuous aerobic system. Read the Digital Trends review.

What this has to do with El Niño

Composting cannot weaken El Niño, prevent La Niña or change the trade winds over the Pacific. Any claim suggesting that a household waste system can directly influence the strength of ENSO would go far beyond the evidence. The relationship is instead one of climate mitigation and resilience: a very strong El Niño reminds us how quickly natural climate variability can place stress on agriculture, water supplies, soils and infrastructure, while human-caused warming raises the background climate on which that variability operates.

Keeping suitable organic material out of methane-intensive landfill pathways is one way to reduce avoidable emissions. Returning appropriate compost to soil can also improve water retention, infiltration and organic matter, which can help farms and landscapes cope with climate stress. Neither action controls ENSO; both address vulnerabilities that matter in a world where natural climate variability and long-term warming increasingly overlap. For a source-by-source explainer focused specifically on the 2026 forecast and the food-waste connection, see GEME’s Climate Hub article, El Niño 2026 Is a Climate Stress Test: Why Food Waste Matters.

Clear definitions matter more than green labels

Climate discussions naturally focus on large systems such as power generation, transportation, buildings and industry. They should, but smaller material flows still matter, particularly when they occur at the scale of millions of households. Food required land, water, fertilizer, refrigeration, transportation and labor before reaching the kitchen, which is why preventing edible food waste should always come before deciding how to process the remainder.

Once unavoidable scraps remain, the relevant questions are straightforward: what process actually occurred, where did the material go afterward, was landfill disposal genuinely avoided, was something useful returned to soil, and what energy and transportation were required along the way? Dehydrators, food recyclers and composters can all serve useful roles in household food waste management, but they solve different problems and should not be treated as environmentally interchangeable.

The environmental distinction is therefore not simply what a machine is called. It is what process occurred and where the material ultimately went. We cannot control the Pacific Ocean, but we can make better decisions about the food we waste and the systems we use to handle it.

About the Author

Matthew Moore writes about food waste, composting, soil resilience and household environmental technology for GEME, a developer of automated microbial composting systems. His work focuses on biological waste treatment, climate resilience and evidence-based environmental communication.

Disclosure

GEME Terra 2 is referenced briefly as one example of household microbial composting technology. Claims concerning El Niño, methane, composting and climate impacts in this article are based on independent NOAA, EPA, IPCC and peer-reviewed sources. The pathway-level climate findings cited above should not be interpreted as a product-specific lifecycle assessment of GEME Terra 2.

Ghardaïa: A Timeless Model of Climate Adaptation and Sustainable Urbanism

Climate change has become one of the greatest challenges facing cities worldwide. Rising temperatures, more frequent heatwaves, increasing water scarcity and growing energy demand are forcing urban planners to rethink the way cities are designed and managed. While technological innovations continue to attract considerable attention, some of the most effective solutions already exist in traditional settlements that have evolved over centuries in harmony with their environment. Among these remarkable examples, the M’Zab Valley in southern Algeria occupies a unique place. Long before concepts such as climate resilience, passive cooling, sustainable urbanism and nature-based solutions entered the scientific vocabulary, the Mozabites developed an urban model capable of ensuring thermal comfort, minimizing energy consumption and preserving scarce natural resources under extreme Saharan conditions [1].

ghardaia algeria

The five fortified settlements (ksour) of the M’Zab Valley – Ghardaïa, Beni Isguen, Melika, Bounoura and El Atteuf- were founded between the eleventh and fourteenth centuries by the Ibadi community. Their location, compact morphology and sophisticated relationship with the surrounding oasis demonstrate an exceptional understanding of local climatic conditions. In recognition of their outstanding universal value, UNESCO inscribed the M’Zab Valley on the World Heritage List in 1982, describing it as an outstanding example of a traditional human habitat perfectly adapted to its environment and emphasizing its continuing relevance for contemporary urban planning [1].

Despite this international recognition, the scientific importance of Ghardaïa extends far beyond its architectural beauty. The city represents one of the earliest examples of what is now called climate-responsive urbanism. Every component of the urban fabric, from street orientation and building density to the organization of public spaces and water management was conceived to mitigate the harsh desert climate while strengthening social cohesion. Rather than relying on mechanical systems, the Mozabites created a built environment that works with natural processes, using shade, thermal inertia, natural ventilation and vegetation to regulate temperatures throughout the year [2].

Much of our understanding of this extraordinary urban intelligence is owed to the pioneering work of the French architect André Ravéreau (1919–2017). Unlike many architects of his generation who regarded vernacular architecture merely as an ethnographic curiosity, Ravéreau recognized the M’Zab as a sophisticated response to environmental constraints. After arriving in Algeria in the 1950s, he devoted several decades to studying the settlements of the valley through meticulous field surveys, architectural drawings and direct observation of local construction practices. His seminal book Le M’Zab, une leçon d’architecture remains one of the most influential works on vernacular architecture in North Africa, demonstrating that every architectural element in Ghardaïa results from a rational dialogue between climate, geography, available materials and social organization [3].

Ravéreau’s contribution was not limited to documentation. Between 1960 and 1962, he participated in the preparation of the urban development plan for Ghardaïa, advocating an approach that respected the historic urban morphology while accommodating modern needs [4]. He argued that urban expansion should not imitate historical forms superficially but should preserve the environmental principles that had made the ksour sustainable for centuries. This philosophy profoundly influenced subsequent discussions on heritage conservation and climate-sensitive urban development in Algeria.

An equally important contribution came from Manuelle Roche, whose extensive photographic documentation and analytical studies complemented Ravéreau’s architectural research. Through her photographs and observations, Roche revealed that the M’Zab is not simply an assemblage of remarkable buildings but a coherent territorial system where architecture, landscape, oasis agriculture and community organization operate as interconnected components [5]. Her work highlighted the intimate relationship between the built environment and the palm grove, showing how the oasis itself functions as an essential climatic infrastructure that moderates temperatures, reduces wind intensity and supports local food production.

Together, Ravéreau and Roche transformed the international perception of Ghardaïa. They demonstrated that the city should not be regarded merely as an architectural heritage site but as a living laboratory of environmental adaptation. Decades before sustainability became a central concern in urban planning, their research revealed that the traditional knowledge embedded in the M’Zab Valley already embodied many principles that contemporary science now recognizes as essential for climate resilience [3,5]. Their work continues to inspire architects, planners and researchers seeking practical responses to the accelerating impacts of climate change, reminding us that innovation does not always require new technologies; it often begins by rediscovering the wisdom of traditional societies.

The exceptional climatic performance of Ghardaïa is not the result of a single architectural feature but of an integrated urban system in which every element contributes to environmental regulation. Unlike many modern cities, where buildings are often designed as isolated objects, the M’Zab Valley demonstrates that urban morphology itself can become an effective climate adaptation strategy. This systemic approach explains why the ksour have remained comfortable despite summer temperatures frequently exceeding 45°C.

One of the most remarkable characteristics of Ghardaïa is its compact urban form. Houses are closely attached to one another, reducing the total external surface exposed to intense solar radiation. Narrow winding streets create permanent shade for pedestrians while simultaneously protecting walls from direct sunlight during much of the day. Modern urban climatology has demonstrated that street geometry, building density and the height-to-width ratio of urban canyons strongly influence surface temperatures and outdoor thermal comfort [6]. In the M’Zab, these principles were intuitively mastered centuries before they became subjects of scientific investigation.

The orientation of streets and buildings also plays a decisive role. Rather than following rigid geometric grids, the urban fabric adapts to topography, prevailing winds and solar exposure. The resulting network of irregular alleys promotes air circulation while limiting the penetration of hot desert winds. This complex geometry creates numerous shaded microclimates that reduce thermal stress for residents throughout the day [3]. Contemporary computational simulations confirm that compact traditional settlements generally experience lower daytime temperatures than dispersed urban layouts exposed to direct solar radiation [7].

Equally important is the architecture of individual dwellings. Traditional Mozabite houses are organized around an interior courtyard that serves multiple climatic functions. The patio allows daylight to penetrate deep into the house without excessive solar gain, while encouraging natural ventilation through pressure differences between shaded and sunlit areas. During the night, cooler air accumulates within the courtyard and contributes to lowering indoor temperatures, whereas thick surrounding walls delay heat transfer during the hottest hours of the day. This passive cooling mechanism significantly reduces dependence on external energy sources [3].

Building materials further enhance thermal performance. Stone, lime, gypsum and earth, all locally available, possess high thermal inertia, enabling buildings to absorb heat during the day and release it gradually after sunset when outdoor temperatures decrease. Numerous experimental studies have demonstrated that such materials stabilize indoor temperatures far more effectively than lightweight modern construction systems in hot-arid climates [8]. Ravéreau repeatedly emphasized that these traditional materials were selected not for aesthetic reasons but because they represented the most efficient response to local environmental conditions [3].

The relationship between the city and the oasis constitutes another fundamental dimension of climate adaptation. The extensive palm grove surrounding Ghardaïa is far more than an agricultural landscape. Date palms create a multi-layered vegetation structure that significantly reduces air temperature through shading and evapotranspiration while protecting crops from intense solar radiation and desert winds [9]. This green infrastructure forms a transitional climatic buffer between the surrounding desert and the urban core. Recent research on Nature-based Solutions has confirmed that urban vegetation remains one of the most effective strategies for mitigating urban heat islands and improving thermal comfort under climate change scenarios [10].

Water management represents another outstanding aspect of Mozabite environmental knowledge. Living in one of the driest regions of North Africa required highly sophisticated systems for collecting, distributing and conserving every available drop of water. Wells, underground galleries, floodwater diversion structures and equitable allocation mechanisms allowed the community to sustain both agriculture and urban life while avoiding overexploitation of scarce groundwater resources [11]. Rather than separating water management from urban planning, the Mozabites integrated hydrological considerations into the very structure of the settlement, an approach that resonates strongly with today’s Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystem (WEFE) Nexus framework.

These environmental strategies cannot be understood independently from the social organization of the ksar. The concentric arrangement around the mosque, the hierarchical distribution of public and private spaces and the collective management of shared resources created a highly cohesive urban community capable of maintaining environmental infrastructures over centuries [12]. Climate adaptation was therefore not merely a technical challenge but a social process supported by shared governance, cultural values and collective responsibility.

The relevance of these principles has become increasingly evident in recent years. Across the Mediterranean and the Middle East, rapidly expanding cities are experiencing severe urban heat island effects caused by extensive asphalt surfaces, low vegetation cover and energy-intensive buildings [13]. Air conditioning has become the dominant response to rising temperatures, yet this solution increases electricity consumption, contributes indirectly to greenhouse gas emissions and often exacerbates outdoor heat through waste heat release. By contrast, Ghardaïa illustrates how passive design strategies can substantially reduce cooling requirements while maintaining acceptable thermal comfort.

Recent numerical studies conducted on buildings designed by André Ravéreau in the M’Zab Valley further validate the effectiveness of his architectural philosophy. Dynamic thermal simulations have shown that his neo-vernacular housing concepts, incorporating ventilated walls, local materials and passive ventilation systems, significantly improve indoor comfort while reducing annual cooling demand [14]. These findings confirm that Ravéreau did not simply document traditional architecture; he translated its environmental principles into modern architectural practice, demonstrating that vernacular knowledge can continue to inform sustainable construction in the twenty-first century.

The lessons offered by Ghardaïa extend far beyond architectural history. They provide a valuable framework for addressing some of the most pressing environmental challenges facing Algeria and the wider Mediterranean region. Rapid urbanization, increasing land consumption, declining green spaces, and growing dependence on air conditioning have made many cities increasingly vulnerable to climate change. The result is a reinforcing cycle in which higher temperatures increase energy demand, while higher energy consumption contributes to greater greenhouse gas emissions and further warming [10,13].

Algerian cities are already experiencing these pressures. Metropolitan areas such as Algiers, Oran, Constantine and Ouargla have expanded rapidly over recent decades, often adopting urban forms that prioritize automobile mobility, wide asphalt roads and isolated concrete buildings. While these models were frequently inspired by international planning trends, they often neglected the environmental wisdom that had enabled traditional settlements such as Ghardaïa to thrive under much harsher climatic conditions. Consequently, many new neighbourhoods now suffer from elevated surface temperatures, limited pedestrian comfort and increasing electricity demand during prolonged summer heatwaves.

The experience of the M’Zab Valley demonstrates that climate adaptation does not necessarily depend on expensive technologies. Instead, it begins with a careful understanding of local environmental conditions and the integration of passive design principles into urban planning. Compact neighbourhoods, shaded public spaces, climate-responsive street orientation, high thermal mass construction, interior courtyards, urban vegetation and efficient water management remain highly relevant strategies for contemporary cities. Modern engineering can further enhance these traditional principles through improved materials, digital modelling and renewable energy systems, creating urban environments that combine heritage with innovation [3,8].

These lessons are increasingly reflected in international climate policy. The IPCC emphasizes that adaptation requires both technological and nature-based solutions, while the New Urban Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals call for cities that are inclusive, resilient and environmentally sustainable [10,15]. In many respects, Ghardaïa anticipated these recommendations centuries ago by integrating architecture, ecology and community governance into a coherent urban system.

This perspective is particularly relevant for emerging concepts such as the Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystem (WEFE) Nexus. The Mozabite settlement illustrates how water conservation, agricultural production, energy efficiency and ecosystem preservation can reinforce one another rather than compete for limited resources. The oasis does not merely supply food; it also regulates the local microclimate, supports biodiversity and contributes to thermal comfort. Similarly, the compact urban form reduces energy demand while preserving valuable agricultural land around the settlement. Such integrated thinking lies at the heart of the WEFE Nexus approach currently promoted for climate-resilient development in arid and semi-arid regions [16].

Nature-based Solutions (NbS) also find an early expression in the M’Zab Valley. The palm grove functions as a natural cooling infrastructure, while the preservation of wadis, vegetation and traditional water systems contributes simultaneously to flood management, biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Rather than treating nature as an obstacle to urban development, the Mozabites incorporated ecological processes into the very structure of the city. This philosophy is now widely recognized as essential for enhancing urban resilience under changing climatic conditions [17].

The legacy of André Ravéreau and Manuelle Roche therefore transcends the conservation of an exceptional heritage site. Their work reminds us that traditional knowledge constitutes an important scientific resource capable of informing contemporary planning. Ravéreau consistently argued that architects should learn from vernacular architecture not by reproducing its forms but by understanding the environmental intelligence that generated them [3]. This distinction remains fundamental. Sustainable urbanism cannot be achieved through superficial imitation of historical styles; it requires rediscovering the underlying principles that enable settlements to coexist harmoniously with their natural environment.

As climate change accelerates, Ghardaïa deserves renewed attention from architects, planners, engineers and policymakers. The city demonstrates that resilience emerges from the interaction between built form, environmental processes and social organization rather than from isolated technological interventions. It also reminds us that innovation is not always synonymous with novelty. Some of the most promising solutions for the future may already exist within the accumulated knowledge of traditional societies that learned, through centuries of experimentation, how to inhabit fragile environments sustainably.

The relevance of Ghardaïa extends well beyond heritage conservation. Its urban model aligns remarkably with many of the priorities shaping international climate and sustainability policies. The compact urban form, passive cooling strategies, efficient water management, integration of oasis ecosystems and reliance on local materials embody principles that are now central to climate-resilient urban planning. These characteristics resonate with the objectives of the European Green Deal, which promotes climate-neutral, resource-efficient and resilient cities, as well as with the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, particularly Sustainable Development Goals 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), 13 (Climate Action) and 15 (Life on Land) [10,15,17,21].

At the Mediterranean scale, where climate change is progressing approximately 20% faster than the global average and is expected to intensify heatwaves, droughts and water scarcity, Ghardaïa provides an exceptional example of how urban settlements can coexist with environmental constraints rather than attempting to overcome them through increasingly energy-intensive technologies [22]. The city demonstrates that climate adaptation is most effective when architecture, urban planning, ecosystem management and community governance are conceived as parts of an integrated system. This holistic vision mirrors the principles of the Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystems (WEFE) Nexus, which recognizes the interdependence of natural resources and promotes coordinated governance to strengthen resilience under climate change [16].

Similarly, the Mozabite urban model anticipates the philosophy underpinning Nature-based Solutions (NbS). The palm grove is not merely an agricultural landscape but a multifunctional ecological infrastructure that regulates the microclimate, enhances biodiversity, stores carbon, supports local livelihoods and improves thermal comfort through evapotranspiration and shading. The traditional management of wadis and water resources further illustrates how ecosystem functions can be harnessed to reduce climate risks while sustaining human development. These are precisely the integrated approaches advocated today by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the European Commission and the Union for the Mediterranean as essential pathways towards climate adaptation and sustainable territorial development [17,23].

Mzab Valley Algeria

For Algeria, the lessons of Ghardaïa are particularly significant. As the country implements its National Climate Plan, updates its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC), advances integrated water resources management and develops strategies for circular economy and climate resilience, the M’Zab Valley offers more than historical inspiration, it provides a scientifically validated model for future urban development. Reinterpreting its environmental principles through contemporary engineering, digital design tools and renewable energy technologies could support the creation of low-carbon, climate-resilient cities adapted to the realities of arid and semi-arid environments.

More than six decades after André Ravéreau and Manuelle Roche revealed the extraordinary environmental intelligence of the M’Zab, their work continues to challenge conventional approaches to urban planning. Their enduring legacy reminds us that the transition towards sustainable cities will not be achieved solely through technological innovation. It also requires rediscovering and adapting the accumulated wisdom embedded in vernacular settlements. In this respect, Ghardaïa should no longer be viewed only as an outstanding cultural landscape but also as one of the world’s earliest and most accomplished examples of climate-responsive urbanism, a model whose lessons are increasingly relevant for building resilient Mediterranean cities in the Anthropocene.

Conclusion

Today, the M’Zab Valley stands not only as one of humanity’s architectural masterpieces but also as a living textbook of climate adaptation. Revisiting the pioneering work of André Ravéreau and Manuelle Roche offers far more than an opportunity to appreciate an extraordinary cultural heritage. It provides practical guidance for designing cities that are energy-efficient, environmentally resilient and socially cohesive in an era of unprecedented climatic uncertainty. As the search for sustainable urban models intensifies across the Mediterranean and beyond, Ghardaïa reminds us that the future of climate-responsive urbanism may well be rooted in the wisdom of the past.

References

[1] UNESCO. (1982). M’Zab Valley. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/188/

[2] Ravéreau, A. (2003). Le M’Zab, une leçon d’architecture. Arles: Actes Sud/Sindbad.

[3] Ravéreau, A. (2007). Du local à l’universel. Montréal: Éditions du Linteau.

[4] Ravéreau, A. (1989). La Casbah d’Alger ou le site crée la ville. Paris: Sindbad–Actes Sud.

[5] Roche, M. (1970). Le M’Zab. Grenoble: Arthaud.

[6] Ruggeri, D. (2021). André Ravéreau et le M’Zab : regarder, dessiner, construire. Insaniyat / إنسانيات, 91–92, 129–154.

[7] Deluz, J.-J. (1988). L’Urbanisme et l’architecture d’Algérie. Alger: Office des Publications Universitaires (OPU).

[14] Bensalem, H., Benhamou, B., et al. (2023). Exploring the Cooling Potential of Ventilated Mask Walls in Neo-Vernacular Architecture: A Case Study of André Ravéreau’s Dwellings in M’zab Valley, Algeria. Buildings, 13(4), 837.

[15] Fathy, H. (1973). Architecture for the Poor: An Experiment in Rural Egypt. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[16] Fathy, H. (1986). Natural Energy and Vernacular Architecture: Principles and Examples with Reference to Hot Arid Climates[8] Givoni, B. (1998). Climate Considerations in Building and Urban Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

[9] Oke, T. R. (1988). Street Design and Urban Canopy Layer Climate. Energy and Buildings, 11, 103–113.

[10] Johansson, E. (2006). Influence of Urban Geometry on Outdoor Thermal Comfort in a Hot Dry Climate: A Study in Fez, Morocco. Building and Environment, 41(10), 1326–1338.

[11] Santamouris, M. (2015). Regulating the Damaged Thermostat of the Cities: Status, Impacts and Mitigation Challenges. Energy and Buildings, 91, 43–56.

[12] Ratti, C., Raydan, D., & Steemers, K. (2003). Building Form and Environmental Performance: Archetypes, Analysis and an Arid Climate. Architectural Science Review, 46(1), 49–59.

[13] Steemers, K. (2003). Energy and the City: Density, Buildings and Transport. Energy and Buildings, 35(1), 3–14.

. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[17] Oliver, P. (2006). Built to Meet Needs: Cultural Issues in Vernacular Architecture. Oxford: Architectural Press.

[18] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[19] United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.

[20] International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (2020). Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions: A User-Friendly Framework for the Verification, Design and Scaling Up of Nature-based Solutions. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.

[21] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2021). The Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystems (WEFE) Nexus: A New Approach in Support of Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture. Rome: FAO.

[22] Mediterranean Experts on Climate and Environmental Change (MedECC). (2020). Climate and Environmental Change in the Mediterranean Basin – Current Situation and Risks for the Future. First Mediterranean Assessment Report. Marseille: MedECC.

[23] European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. (2021). Evaluating the Impact of Nature-Based Solutions: A Handbook for Practitioners. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Waste Management in the GCC: Things to Know

Fast industrialisation, urbanisation, enhanced consumerism and rise in standards of living is causing generation of large quantities of waste which needs to be stored, transported, treated and disposed. Globally, municipal and urban governments are spending huge financial and human resources on waste management but the service coverage is barely coinciding with the generated waste quantities as overflowing communal containers and waste heaps are amply witnessed in all major urban centres.

The worldwide quantities of municipal solid waste are rapidly increasing. According to a UNEP study, around 2.1 billion tonnes of MSW was generated worldwide in 2023, which is expected to reach 3.8 billion tonnes by 2030. The solid waste generation in the GCC nations is estimated to be around 150 million tons per year with per capita waste generation ranging from 470 to 700 kg/capita/year.

landfill in Dubai

Solid Waste Management in the GCC

In the GCC region, municipal solid waste consists of domestic waste from residential areas, commercial wastes from markets and commercial centers and institutional waste generated from offices, educational institutes etc., construction waste, garden waste and animal carcasses. The waste is either stored in plastic or metal from where it is emptied into compactors and trucks and transported to the landfill site for disposal. The waste at the landfill site is compacted and covered with sand to avoid any pollution.

The broad categories of MSW in the GCC are biodegradable waste (food and kitchen waste, green waste etc.), recyclables (paper, glass, bottles, cans, metals, certain plastics etc.), inert waste (construction and demolition waste, street sweepings, litter, dirt, soil, debris etc.), composite wastes (waste clothing, tetra packs, waste plastics) and domestic hazardous waste.

MSW generation and its management in Gulf nations involves severe health risks and impacts including decomposition and biodegradation of waste due to high temperatures causing obnoxious odours, proliferation of insects and rodents, occurrences of unwanted major and minor fires, contamination of soil and water by leachate generated from the landfills, emissions of toxic gases from waste disposal, burning and incineration.

MSW also contribute to climate change primarily because of methane and carbon dioxide gas emissions. Impacts on terrestrial and marine ecology, traffic generation, road congestion, accidents, dust and noise generation, nuisance, bird hazards, occupational health hazards, litter generation and spreading, impairment of area aesthetics are other serious impacts. Unattended waste attracts flies, rats, and other vermins that in turn spread diseases.

We need to understand that the problem of MSW cannot be solved by the governmental authorities alone. We need to equally share the burden in reducing the quantities of waste, storing all garbage generated in containers, segregating waste to assist recycling activities and spreading the message of having environmental friendly waste management. Public awareness and change of attitudes towards waste are required as it affect the population’s willingness to cooperate and participate in practicing efficient waste management practices.

Source reduction is a successful method of reducing waste generation in the GCC countries. Practices such as grass recycling, backyard composting can yield substantial benefits. It prevents emissions of greenhouse gases, reduces pollutants, saves energy, conserves resources and reduces the need for new landfills.